data_compliance_and_wsi
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| data_compliance_and_wsi [2022/10/20 11:09] – created rudy | data_compliance_and_wsi [2026/03/23 11:34] (current) – rudy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | **Privacy | + | ====== Data compliance |
| - | Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) is a relatively new category of patient data. As such, recently, some efforts have been made to better understand how WSIs (whole slide images) can be utilized in a balancing act: maximizing individual and public benefit, while at the same time, restricting and protecting its access, whenever such poses a potential privacy risk and non-compliance with data privacy laws (e.g. GDPR). Although by itself the patient’s photographic tissue image falls under the category of de facto anonymity (add note) of the GDPR, the existence of patient-ids and/or other tags attached to the WSI, increase the likelihood of patient identification, | + | ===== Privacy Regulations and WSI ===== |
| + | |||
| + | Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) is a relatively new category of patient | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| - | The novelty of this type of personal data is revealed when histopathologists describe their knowledge and confidence when dealing with WSIs as personal data. In a survey (n=198) conducted by the Oxford University Hospitals, addressed to histopathologists members of major pathology associations in the UK, 41% of the respondents did not know when WSIs would fall under relevant legal frameworks, while 47% were not confident “At all” when it came to understand the WSI consent in a research context (Coulter et al.; 2022). | + | The novelty of this type of personal data is revealed when histopathologists describe their knowledge and confidence when dealing with WSIs as personal data. In a survey (n=198) conducted by the Oxford University Hospitals, addressed to histopathologists members of major pathology associations in the UK, 41% of the respondents did not know when WSIs would fall under relevant legal frameworks, while 47% were not confident “at all” when it came to understanding |
| + | |||
| + | Digital Imaging Storage and management standards are widely adopted in the field of Radiology, which facilitates the adoption of sound data compliance practices. | ||
| + | However, adoption of data management standards in digital pathology differs. Beside workflow specificities and the novelty of the field, another major difference lies in the role of the pathology professional societies. The Advanced Radiology Services Foundation (ARS) took the lead and imposed standard and clear guidance for radiologists and industry through the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) initiative.\\ | ||
| - | Digital imaging Storage and management standards are widely adopted in the field of Radiology, which facilitates the adoption of sound data compliance practices. When it comes to digital pathology and data management standards adoption differences, | + | Pathology societies have not implemented a definitive framework |
| + | //"If you do not need personal data, do not collect personal data (…) if you really need personal data, then start by pseudonymising this personal data."// \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **References**\\ | ||
| + | Holub et al 2023: https:// | ||
| + | Coulter et al 2022: https:// | ||
| + | Thomas Zerdick 2021: https:// | ||
| - | If you do not need personal data, do not collect personal data (…)if you really need personal data, then start by pseudonymising this personal data. Thomas Zerdick. | ||
data_compliance_and_wsi.1666256995.txt.gz · Last modified: by rudy
